Amazon v. NLRB concerns mandatory workplace meetings that discuss unionization
By NFIB,
NFIB’s brief argues two main points: 1) the NLRB’s decision misunderstands the U.S. Supreme Court’s rulings regarding unwilling listeners, and 2) the NLRB’s decision regulates speech, not conduct, because enforcement depends on examination of the ideas communicated, not the action itself.
NFIB has been active in protecting employer free speech against encroachment from both the federal and state governments. NFIB is currently challenging a Minnesota law that similarly restricts employer free speech in the workplace.
The NFIB Small Business Legal Center protects the rights of small business owners in the nation’s courts. NFIB is currently active in more than 40 cases in federal and state courts across the country and in the U.S. Supreme Court.
Disclaimer: Articles featured on Oregon Report are the creation, responsibility and opinion of the authoring individual or organization which is featured at the top of every article.