The Oregon Biz Report - Business News from Oregon

Read about accutane journal moderate acne here

Union submits health care ballot measure

November 19, 2013

by Betsy Earls
Associated Oregon Industries

As if the 10 tax increase proposals SEIU has already filed for November 2014 weren’t enough, the union may be adding up to five new ballot measures aimed directly at Oregon hospitals. The potential ballot measures are part of the SEIU’s Act Now for a Healthy Oregon initiative that “promotes access to quality, affordable health care for all Oregonians.” While no one would argue with the goal of providing high-quality, affordable health care for Oregonians, the manner and timing in which the initiatives seek to meet those goals are problematic.

The measures we expect to see include: charity care thresholds; requirements for uniform pricing; caps on executive compensation; and two transparency measures that require public postings of hospital charges and quality performance. Click here to view the summary of the proposed measures.

Right now, hospitals in every community have their hands full with the reality of implementing federal health care reform while continuing to provide high-quality care to patients. Hospitals are also committed to Oregon-specific health care transformation work. On top of all that, they are working hard to achieve the Oregon Health Policy Board’s “Triple Aim,” which includes directives to improve quality and access, and reduce cost. These are complex issues, and the timing of SEIU’s ballot measures is likely to create a serious distraction from the ongoing work to make both federal and state health reforms succeed.

The business community and the state will need to carefully analyze each measure filed in order to understand the impacts they will have on our communities and our communities’ ability to deliver health care. If we have learned anything from our colleagues in other states, who have faced similar ballot measures, it is that the motive and underlying objective behind these proposals is not always to genuinely improve access to health care, but rather to lay the groundwork for labor organizing.

Print This Post Print This Post    Email This Post Email This Post

Discuss this article

John Fairplay November 19, 2013

It’s so weird that unions want to cause people to die by forcing health professionals to focus on something other than good care of sick people.

Bob Clark November 19, 2013

This state’s governance is so whacked. And most of the root cause is public employee unions dominate campaign funding, effectively buying off most elected officials. These elected officials then appoint judges who are responsible for reviewing ballot titles. And ballot title is nearly everything in the state’s initiative process. If the ballot title is warm and fuzzy but the actual underlying law is rather counter to the title, the measure still has a very, very good chance of passing with the electorate. It takes a lot of money to campaign against a measure with a nice ballot title but with a contrary underlying effect.

Ballot title review and approval should not be left to the Attorney General and judges, but should include a jury of randomly selected election eligible citizens.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please answer the following question to confirm that you are a real person: *

Top Business News


Top Natural Resource News


Top Faith News


Copyright © 2019, OregonReport. All Rights Reserved. | Terms of Use - Copyright - Legal Policy | Contact Oregon Report

--> --> -->