The Oregon Biz Report - Business News from Oregon

Read about accutane journal moderate acne here

California rule slams pet entrepreneur

September 6, 2013

U.S. Chamber of Commercechckfrth

Chuck Firth of Batavia, IL, loves cats. How much, you ask?

Well, according to Chuck, he and his family had as many as seven furry feline friends at one point. Multiple cats means multiple litter boxes, and a lot of cleaning up after they “do their business.”

Dissatisfied with the quality of pooper-scoopers on the market, Chuck set out create his own super-scooper: The Durascoop Original.

Unfortunately, more than 2,100 miles away, opportunistic plaintiffs’ lawyers were using an obscure law — California’s Proposition 65 — to file abusive lawsuits that threaten the future of the Durascoop.

“Prop 65” requires that any consumer products that contain any one of 800 different chemicals to include a warning label.  Because many of these chemicals can be found in a wide array of common, everyday, household products, the failure to properly label and meet requirements of Prop 65 has created a cottage industry for a handful of plaintiffs’ lawyers.

Under Prop 65, the plastic handle on Chuck’s Durascoop needed a warning label.  So, lawyers filed lawsuits that may have the impact of forcing Chuck to shut his doors, taking the popular Durascoop off the market for good.

Here are three reasons this lawsuit really stinks:

1) It Might Destroy an Innovative American Business.

“Owing my own business really was a dream come true,” according to Chuck.

But now, lawsuit abuse is turning that dream into a nightmare and could force Chuck to close his doors for good.

One less American business. Less Durascoops. More cat poop.

2) It Could Knock the Purrrrfect Pooper-Scooper Off the Market for Good

Cat lovers found the Durascoop Original to be the cat’s meow and it became the most popular pooper-scooper on the market.

These cat owners may soon be out of luck, however, thanks to plaintiffs’ attorneys who, according to Chuck, are “skimming off the backs” of innovators like him.

3) Plaintiffs’ Lawyers are “Skimming off the Backs” of Business Owners

Like cats to catnip, California lawyers were drawn to the money-making possibilities created by Prop 65.  In 2011 alone there were 338 settlements in Prop 65 cases, totaling more than $16 million dollars.  Who got the majority of this fancy feast of cash?  Plaintiff’s lawyers, of course, taking home about 75% of the settlement money.

As Chuck put it: “We created value where there was none before.  These guys are skimming off the backs of the people who are actually doing all the innovation, creating the value, adding  to the economy.  And they’re laughing all the way to the bank.”

If it sounds like something smells, it’s what the Durascoop scoops.

It’s the lawsuit.

Crossposted from The Faces of Lawsuit Abuse website.

  
Print This Post Print This Post    Email This Post Email This Post

Discuss this article

no comments yet

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Top Business News

 

Top Women's News

 

Top Natural Resource News

 

Top Faith News

 

Copyright © 2016, OregonReport. All Rights Reserved. | Terms of Use - Copyright - Legal Policy | Contact Oregon Report

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Business Report through daily email updates:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

RSS Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)