The Oregon Biz Report - Business News from Oregon

Read about accutane journal moderate acne here

Concerns over Oregon’s newspaper future

July 10, 2013

Patrick Emerson PhD ,
OSU Economist
Oregon Economics Blog

I fear for The Oregonian, but do not delight in its demise – in fact the exact opposite is true: I think investigative journalism is a incredibly valuable public good and I worry that society is undervaluing it and squandering it as the print journalism business model dies as I have said many times here on this blog.

That said I am very worried about the future of the Oregonian and here are a few reasons why:

One: The move into being a digital first company would inspire a lot more confidence if they hadn’t shown over the last decade that they are so completely inept at it.  I realize that a lot of this is the way Advance structured the separate “OregonLive” operation, but the “OregonLive website, even after the extensive overhaul, is one of the worst sites I have ever used for news.  And this, by the way is the sum total of Advance’s economies of scale and scope strategy – OregonLive.com is identical to the other advance sites, most notably NOLA.com. So what makes Advance believe that they can suddenly, by switching focus, become great at it?  They have had more than a decade already with terrible results.

The slow switch to a digital first model has been painful to live through.  Horribly written and seemingly unedited stories pop up on OregonLive as soon as possible only to go through many mutations and eventually end up as the finished product (usually edited successfully, but not always) in the print paper.  On line there may be two or three versions of the story still on OregonLive (but of course if you try to use their search function for them you will find none) and a number of ancillary bits to wade through (let’s give them VIDEO!!).  O reporters suddenly pop up on social media and desperately try and get a twitter following so they can show their editors how hip and 21st century they are. [Here is a tip – too late for most I am afraid – follow EVERYBODY and just go and find irrelevant, amusing, pithy stuff on the internets and tweet them all the time]

Two: which leads us to comparative advantage.  If the new business model is to be based on on-line page views and the ad revenue they generate (did I just say that?) readers need to come to the O and not other places.  Why would they do that?  The ONLY valuable asset (now that the printing presses and ops are worthless) the Oregonian has is its name and reputation.  I still turn to the O for the authoritative word, but there is not much of a reason to anymore except that I am old and slow to adapt.  The human capital at the O, upon which its reputation is based, has been completely gutted.  Reporting is a science and art that takes many years to perfect.  Over the years reporters learn how the systems work, learn how to get the information, develop contacts and sources, etc.  The digital age has not been kind to the O in its efforts to shed legacy costs (read: high salaries and pensions) as all the of the new fresh faced journalism school grads they hire quickly have their faces up with there digital byline and a website full of reporters who look like they are writing for the high school paper is not something that enhances the reputation of the O as much as destroys it.

So there is no reason, I am afraid, that folks will turn to the digital O for news when there are so many other sources.  True, maybe there will be no serious competition, for which society will suffer no doubt, but then there also may be too little viewership to support it anyway.  For if the O’s business model is successful, there will be competition, but if it is a looser, they will have the market to themselves.

Three: being driven by the eyeballs on pages business model means being driven by more fluff and less serious investigative journalism.  The most read stories as of this morning on OregonLive?:

  1. Bumblebee memorial scheduled for Sunday at Wilsonville Target
  2. Canzano: Trail Blazers pass draft test, but face tricky free agency
  3. Quick: CJ McCollum provides his first assist on his first day with the Trail Blazers
  4. Trail Blazers nab unexpectedly available Allen Crabbe, Jeff Withey in second round
  5. Blazers Insider: Although LaMarcus Aldridge wants out of Portland, don’t expect it to happen Thursday

Okay so the sports part of OregonLive might be able to sustain itself…

Perhaps the most ironic thing is that the very week after which all of the changes to the Oregonian were announced, they roll out one of those long-form investigative journalism Pulitzer-fishing pieces that is certainly a relic of the bygone era.  You can almost hear the discussion in the editor’s room: “well, hell, he has done all of this work, let’s just get the thing published quick before Advance can round-file it.”  Hell, Les Zaitz has only 470 twitter followers, there is no room for a reporter with so few twitter followers in the new Oregon…(Joe Rose, master of the new form, has more than 6,700, so maybe commuting news will sustain itself too).  Besides, who the hell cares about Pulitzers anymore?  Not the kiddos looking for Blazer draft news…  So what it really does is serve as a stark reminder of what we have lost.

So what would I do?  I honestly don’t know so though this reads like a relentless criticism, it isn’t.  I don’t have any good answers.  This is more about my worry that this strategy will not work.  Hell, even the New York Times couldn’t make open access profitable.  Can an old-style newsroom still exist and what are the implications for a democracy that depends so heavily on the fourth estate if they can’t?

Or maybe I am all wrong – maybe we don’t need the MSM in this new digital world.  Maybe blogs, press releases and the occasional look in from wire services is enough.  I doubt it.

So here is hoping that the new digital Oregonian will be a success and that we can still count on one place where real, original, investigative reporting thrives.  If not we will all be the poorer for it.

  
Print This Post Print This Post    Email This Post Email This Post

Discuss this article

Britt Storkson July 10, 2013

The Oregonian? What investigative journalism? If the Oregonian and other so-called journalists actually objectively investigated something you might have a case. But they’re lapdogs, not watchdogs. They spend far more time covering up government corruption than they do exposing it. This is not hard to prove.

Matt July 10, 2013

I agree with you Pat, as a stategy built on a horrible platform called OregonLive, this is doomed. Look at the Seattle Times site, it’s very good in my opinion and regionally only makes the Oregoninian look amateurish.

The only hope is to price news-gathering at what it is, maybe with regional syndication or partnerships with other news organizations. We will all lose subscribers unless and until all of us put the content behind the pay wall and charge for it. Advertisers can only carry news so far, unless the content is compelling enough for people to pay for it, we’re done.

People think nothing of paying Directtv, Dish or Comcast $80-$100 a month for 500 channels they watch 20 of, I dare say news organizations can play in that space if they have something serious to offer and none of it is free.

Steve July 18, 2013

I am in agreement with you Pat. The loss of print media, or at least an online media that takes news seriously has a lot of negative potential for democracy and for our lives.

I also agree that online media seems to suffer from a lack of effective up-front editing. Case in point – This issue of the OSU Economics blog tries to spell ‘a person who loses’ – loser; but ended up spelling ‘not tight’ – looser! 🙂

Terry W. July 18, 2013

Oregonian made their staff cuts, print cost cuts, they are in good shape. Critics saying this for years.

Dean July 18, 2013

Do someone say lapdog? How true. Six mega corporations control
at least 90% of all media in the US including TV and Hollywood.
The billionair Newhouse famility owns the Oregonian along with many other media and they are literally kissing cousins and are part of the
big Six. There is little hope for objective news here and around the
world with such consentraton in such few hands. This country is in
big trouble.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Articles

Press Releases



Top Business News

 

Top Women's News

 

Top Natural Resource News

 

Top Faith News

 

Copyright © 2016, OregonReport. All Rights Reserved. | Terms of Use - Copyright - Legal Policy | Contact Oregon Report

Stay Tuned...

Stay up to date with the latest political news and commentary from Oregon Business Report through daily email updates:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Prefer another subscription option? Subscribe to our RSS Feed, become a fan on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

RSS Twitter Facebook

No Thanks (close this box)