The Oregon Biz Report - Business News from Oregon

Read about accutane journal moderate acne here

Oregon Appeals Court affirms 200-1 punitive damages ratio

January 3, 2013

Oregon Court of Appeals affirms 200-1 ratio of punitive damages to compensatory damages
from Ater-Wynne:
NW Business Litigation

The Oregon Court of Appeals  affirmed a jury award of $100,000 in punitive damages in a case where compensatory damages were $500. The Court applied the standards set forth by the Oregon Supreme Court last year in Hamlin v. Hampton Lumber Mills, Inc., finding that the defendant engaged in sufficiently reprehensible behavior to justify punitive damages 200 times compensatory damages.

In Lithia Medford LM, Inc. v. Yovan, defendant purchased an automobile from plaintiff, and soon thereafter found a discrepancy between the mileage on the odometer and the actual mileage. Following an extended dispute over how to resolve the issue, plaintiff sued to rescind the sale due to mutual mistake. Defendant counterclaimed for violation of the Oregon Unlawful Debt Collections Practices Act. The trial court reduced the jury’s award of $100,000 in punitive damages to $2,000, to bring it in line with the modest amount of compensatory damages.

Hearing the case en banc, the Court of Appeals split on whether the trial court properly reduced the punitives award to a single-digit multiple of the compensatory damages. Judge Nakamoto, writing for the majority, stated that the consumer had proven that the car dealer “repeatedly used deceptive and abusive tactics against a financially vulnerable consumer to enhance its financial interests.” The court also pointed to the dealer’s “arrogant presentation to the jury of its position that it had done nothing wrong” to justify retaining the jury’s punitive damages award. These facts supported the 200-1 ratio of punitive to compensatory damages.

Judge Wollheim, writing for the minority, advocated for reducing the punitives to $25,000, which is comparable to the statutory penalties available under the Unlawful Debt Collections Practices Act.

See our discussion of Hamlin, and its analysis of punitive damages in cases in which compensatory damages are small, here.

Print This Post Print This Post    Email This Post Email This Post

Discuss this article

Roofing HamiltonWindows And Doors HamiltonVinyl Siding RepairRoofers HamiltonSiding HamiltonComplete RoofingOakville Windows And DoorsHamilton RoofingWood SidingAluminum SidingBurlington RoofingOakville RoofingRoofing BurlingtonWindow Repair HamiltonRoofi May 26, 2014

This type of roofing is very easily to repair or replace.
They are normally 50 percent bigger and 33 percent thicker.
Other than rain, powerful winds are also fairly typical
in the early spring.

lawn mower June 6, 2014

If you are going for best contents like myself,
simpoly go too see this wweb page daily because it provides feature contents, thanks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please answer the following question to confirm that you are a real person: *

Top Business News


Top Natural Resource News


Top Faith News


Copyright © 2019, OregonReport. All Rights Reserved. | Terms of Use - Copyright - Legal Policy | Contact Oregon Report

--> --> -->