The Oregon Biz Report - Business News from Oregon

Read about accutane journal moderate acne here

Revising data shows econony worse than we thought

August 1, 2011

By Bill Conerly,
Conerly Consulting
, Businomics

The economy is certainly weak. The latest report on GDP showed sub-par growth in the second quarter. Revisions to past data, which occur every summer, showed that the first quarter was even worse than we previously thought. Here’s a comparison of GDP growth rates, with “old” indicating the official data as released prior to today, and “revised” indicating the new view. I’ve highlighted the significant differences.

Looking at past history, the recession was worse than we previously thought–not a surprise, really, when you think about the sharp decline in employment at the time.

The bigger surprise is the downward revision of first quarter 2011, as well as fourth quarter 2010. The latest monthly numbers show us slumping, and this data release confirms it.

Where are we going from here? I continue to think that the time lags on monetary policy are long, and thus the benefits of the Federal Reserve’s quantitative easing will be felt in the second half of the year.

Note on the statistics: the government revises official statistics periodically because … it really does not know everything. Early announcements are based on surveys of a sample of companies and people, plus educated guess-work. Over time, more tax returns are files, informational returns are filed. Periodically, a business census is done, such as the Census of Manufactures which is conducted every five years. The statisticians take the fuller data, but still have some magic to do. Those periodic censuses are used to nail down certain points (like every fifth year’s level of output), with lesser quality data used to estimate the quarterly fluctuations between the fifth-year data points. In addition, more data give us better seasonsal adjustment, which itself consitutes a revision. This data stuff is not political; it’s simply good statistics.

Print This Post Print This Post    Email This Post Email This Post

Discuss this article

Bob Clark August 1, 2011

It’s kind of hard to push Keynesian fiscal deficit stimulus when the country is on the brink of a credit downgrade. Kind of have to let things run their course. However, I do think the government could provide a deregulation stimulus by allowing more conventional energy projects to proceed such as oil drilling in ANWR and the building of the mega-sized Keystone XL pipeline. We need a new president who reflects a growing desire to put much tighter environmental restrictions on the backburner and move the economy to the frontburner. A growing number of business leaders, outside the crony capitalists looking for government largesse like Immelt of GE, are voicing uncertainty over the rules coming out of the Obama administration. They say the administration is killing enthusiasm for business investment and hiring. Deregulation doesn’t really cost the government any cash outlays…so, deregulation is a low cost way of stimulating the economy. But we won’t get this unless leadership is changed out in 2012.

On the bright side, the housing sector continues to muddle its way out of the 00s bubble and with lower mortgage rates, things might turn for the better next year.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please answer the following question to confirm that you are a real person: *

Top Business News


Top Natural Resource News


Top Faith News


Copyright © 2019, OregonReport. All Rights Reserved. | Terms of Use - Copyright - Legal Policy | Contact Oregon Report

--> --> -->