The Oregon Biz Report - Business News from Oregon

Read about accutane journal moderate acne here

Oregon NFIB discusses three bad business bills

April 16, 2009

By Alyssa Williams, BIZ Reporter

1. Family Leave Payroll Tax: (SB 966)
2. Employer censorship bill (SB 519)
Corporate minimum tax bill

With Oregon now having the highest rate of unemployment in the nation, hitting a staggering 12.1 percent in March, the Oregon division of the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB/OR) is evaluating most current legislation based on whether it kills or creates jobs, according to NFIB/OR State Director Jenna Kaluza.

Senate Bill 966 family leave payroll tax. NFIB/OR opposes Senate Bill 966 for paid family leave because the program taxes employees in the worst economic times, said Kaluza. The bill, which taxes workers 2 cents for every hour of work (around a total of $42 a year), allows an employee $300 a week for up to six weeks of leave at a time for extended caregiving, not personal illness. However, the law would exclude companies with less than 25 employees, she said.

Because the majority of the 7,000 businesses that Kaluza serves employ seven or less people, the bill does not solve much for the companies she represents. She claimed a new insurance program seems unnecessary when many business owners already work on a policy of good faith with medical and other forms of leave.

The NFIB/OR state director also pointed out the bill has yet to provide evidence that a 2 cent tax every work hour would be enough to fund the program, or if enough people would take the paid leave to make it worth tax payers’ money.

Senate Bill 519, Employer censorship bill. According to Kaluza, this bill prevents employers from discussing religion and politics (defined as unionization) in a meeting, making it illegal to discipline employees if they are absent from employer sponsored meetings about such topics. As Kaluza explained, if there are two employees and a supervisor in a room and one of the employees asks about the advantages and disadvantages of unionization, it would be illegal for the supervisor to discuss the issue until the second employee leaves.

NFIB/OR does not support this bill because federally regulated law already prevents employee bullying (the core concern of the bill), and it only exposes employers to more lawsuits and penalties, potentially resulting in job loss, she said.

Proposals to increase the corporate minimum tax.
To put it simply, the NFIB/OR opposes these bills because it taxes such items as payroll and healthcare, among other things. (See the Oregon Report March 3, 2009 article “House panel eyes Corporate Minimum Tax Increase” by John Marshall for more information.)  Kaluza finds no merit in these bills that penalize companies with health benefit packages in a time when it is not questioned whether a business will lay off, but how many people will be laid off.

In summary, Kaluza does not believe that Oregon law makers are approaching the economic decline correctly. “We need to have a bigger conversation,” she said about the multitude of recent bills that propose to help Oregon survive the recession. “We all need to find a gap in the budget and decide where revenue needs to be made and stop having multiple discussions about how to raise money.”

Alyssa Williams

Print This Post Print This Post    Email This Post Email This Post

Discuss this article

Alice April 16, 2009

None of these bills seems to make sense for the people of Oregon.

Alpha Dog April 16, 2009

On teh censhorship bill, is this a real problem? The crafting of this legislation seems more like labor sticking it to managment and doing so by using the law. Without having to say it, that is a terrible idea and a wild waste of the State Legislature’s time.

Keith April 24, 2009

RE: Paid Family Leave Insutrnce Program – Under the best of economic conditions, this is a proposal from la-la land: There is no realistic way to predict the true utilization and cost of such a utopian dream. Worse yet, under current economic conditions, the very LAST thing needed by employers and workers alike is another ding on their already-tenuous finances.

Sybella May 12, 2009

Paid family leave will just make it harder for employers to keep employees. This could be disastrous for small business. If a business needs three people all the time and one is often gone because family is more important than supporting them, the business will not have much else to do but close their doors. As it is in this high unemployment time, there aren’t many wanting jobs. Since December, I have not seen one new application for employment, We have been shorthanded since then, and the employment dept is begging us to take on Jobs Plus people. So far one is in training. One never bothered to show up and we’re debating if it’s worth messing with.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please answer the following question to confirm that you are a real person: *

Top Business News


Top Natural Resource News


Top Faith News


Copyright © 2018, OregonReport. All Rights Reserved. | Terms of Use - Copyright - Legal Policy | Contact Oregon Report

--> --> -->