The Oregon Biz Report - Business News from Oregon

Read about accutane journal moderate acne here

Businomics: Avoiding a Recession Without the Bailout Bill

October 6, 2008

By Bill Conerly, Businomics, Conerly Consulting,

The critical issue is whether main street businesses that rely on credit to fund their operations will be cut off, suddenly, from credit.  A sudden cut-off of credit to otherwise healthy companies would trigger a severe recession, but I think we have the tools in place now to prevent that.
Bank credit depends on two key issues:  do the banks have the raw materials for loans, and do the banks have the capital necessary to make loans.

If depositors remove money from banks, there’s a raw material problem.  However, the Federal Reserve has the authority to lend to banks as needed to maintain credit flows.  They also have the authority to extend their credit outside of traditional commercial banking.  I am convinced that the Fed will make the raw material available to banks as needed.

The second issue is capital capacity.  Bank shareholders have to have some skin in the game.  If the value of the bank’s assets falls, then the capital of the bank falls.  At some point, capital might become insufficient for the size of the bank.  The bank then must either sell more stock, or shrink its assets, such as by refusing to make new loans.

What’s the condition of banks?  As of the end of last quarter, commercial banks and thrifts had core (Tier 1) capital equal to 7.89% of their assets.  Is this a lot?  It’s down from a year prior, but here’s the requirement: to be “well capitalized” a bank needs six percent.  So the industry as a whole was well above standards.  The FDIC Quarterly Banking Profile reports that over 99% of the assets of banks and thrifts were in well capitalized banks.  Banks that are under six percent but over four percent are called “adequately capitalized,” but despite the title operate under some restrictions.  With less than four percent capital banks need a plan to pull themselves up to adequate capitalization.

We don’t know how the summer’s market turmoil is hitting banks.  We’ll certainly have a number of banks drop in capital when the Sept. 30 report is published.  However, I think we’ll still have adequate capitalization overall.

Here’s what bank regulators need to do.  Cut some slack on institutions that have low capital because of mark-to-market requirements in thin markets.  Encourage poorly-capitalized banks to participate loans out to well-capitalized banks.  (This means Bank A lends a company $100, then passes a portion of the IOU over to Bank B.)

With aggressive Fed lending to banks that have lost deposits, along with reasonable judgment by regulators, credit can continue flowing to healthy banks and consumers.  That means the real side of the economy, spending, production and income, do not go into a worse downturn.


Bill Conerly is principal of Conerly Consulting LLC, chief economist of, and was previously Senior Vice President at First Interstate Bank. Bill Conerly writes up-to-date comments on the economy on his blog called “Businomics” and produces a monthly audio magazine available on CD. Conerly is author of “Businomics™: From the Headlines to Your Bottom Line: How to Profit in Any Economic Cycle”, which connects the dots between the economic news and business decisions.

Print This Post Print This Post    Email This Post Email This Post

Discuss this article

Newserman October 6, 2008

Well they better do it fast. Because the latest news is “Dow Plunges 550 Points”. Yikes!!!

Alpha Dog October 6, 2008

I thought the bailout was suppossed to fix all of this. Even after the positive vote on Friday the stock market went down. Something more tangible and real needs to happen to fix the crisis and the confidence.

John Maszka October 6, 2008

This bailout is just one more example of the indivisible handjob stroking irresponsible CEOs and CFOs with billions so that they can run the American economy even further into the ground. So much for Keynesian economics. If the goal is to stimulate the economy, why not give the money directly to the American taxpayers? We could do twice as much good for the economy by giving half as much money directly to hardworking American taxpayers. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush administration.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please answer the following question to confirm that you are a real person: *

Top Business News


Top Natural Resource News


Top Faith News


Copyright © 2018, OregonReport. All Rights Reserved. | Terms of Use - Copyright - Legal Policy | Contact Oregon Report

--> --> -->